Who Owns Grand Saga ???

Here's a link of BASIC INFORMATION ON PRIVATIZED PROJECTS

This is f@cking madness !!!
Looks Like It's A Family Shareholders Thing in the LIM LIM LIM FAMILY !!!
HOKKIEN MEANING OF LIM = DRINK !!!!!!! SO DRINK ALL THE MONEY WE CAN !!!

Selangor MB: State firm owns stake in Grand Saga.

Selangor Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim revealed today that a state-owned company holds a sizeable stake in toll concessionaire Grand Saga, which is embroiled in a dispute with Bandar Mahkota Cheras (BMC) residents.

"We are holding an executive council meeting this evening and we will come up with out position. I have to listen to all the facts and study the reason why the situation has to come to this stage, "he told reporters at Parliament lobby.

Khalid did not name the state-owned company.

It is learnt that state investment arm Kumpulan Perangsang Selangor indirectly owns a substantial portion of Grand Saga.

He noted that the concessionaire wants to ensure that traffic will flow into the toll road, to enhance revenue.

"I have spoken to the works minister and we are in discussion to find ways to resolve the issue, "said khalid.

Later at the press conference held in Shah Alam after the Selangor state exco meeting, Khalid said that the government, in its capacity as a shareholder in Grand Saga, would be calling for an emergency general meeting (EGM) of the company to seek explanation on the company's stern stand on the barricade matter.

He said the state also wanted an explanation on the alleged use of THUGS by Grand Saga against the residents.

He added that the state government would be writing to the Malaysia Highway Authorities (LLM) to inquire if they had given permission to Grand Saga to erect the new barricade.

"If LLM confrims that they indeed given such an approval, we will ask for the barricade to be removed, "he said.

BMC fracas: Police beat up youth without mercy.

By his account, he was only a curiosity-seeker who wanted to know what was going on at the site of a disputed barricade near Bandar Mahkota (Cheras) BMC last night.

In no time at all, however, Chang Jiun Haur was soaked in his own blood after being repeatedly beaten by 20 riot squad (FRU) personnel armed with batons and kicked with boots.

Chang 21, his sister and friends were driving away from the site of the barricade about 11:30pm, when their car was surrounded by police personnel who had earlier dealt with a fracas involving BMC residents.

A high ranking police officer at the scene claimed that Chang had run over a FRU personnel with his car.

"He asked for it. He ran over a policeman and he got what he deserved, "he told malaysiakini a few minutes after the incident.

Asked to identify the person who was hit by the car, the officer had initial difficulty in persuading the individual to come forward.

When he did so, the man-who appeared unscathed-claimed "He tried to run over me...look at my baton, it is broken. What more evidence do you want?"

However, a police officer who took Chang to the Kajang Hospital said none of the personnel had been hit by the injured man's car.

Chang, when met at the hospital at 12:30am,have also denied this as well "We had just come back (to Kuala Lumpur) from Port Dickson and wanted to see what was going on."

He was lying on a bed, with bloodied mouth. His shirt had been torn off by the police, and his shorts were drenched in blood. He was crying from the shock and trauma, and was unable to say more.

It is learnt that Chang was placed in intensive care unit. The other occupants of his car were arrested last night, but were released today according to BMC Open Road Committee chairperson Tan
Boon Hwa who been keeping tabs on last night's dramatic events.

DAP Selangor executive councillor Ronnie Liu, who visited Chang later last night, said the police had over-reacted and the excessive use of the force could not be justified.

"The police should maintain law and order and not assault people. I am disapointed. My party will provide Chang and the others with lawyers,"said Liu.

According to Liu, the beating was so severe that Chang lost one or two of his teeth.

MALAYSIA BOLEH !!! YEAH THAT'S THE WAY FOR OUR MALAYSIAN POLICE FORCE,KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK...WHAT IF THAT WAS YOUR SON BEEN BEATEN LIKE A DOG ?? WONDER THAT !! I BELIEVE IN KARMA...."WHAT GOES AROUND,COMES AROUND"

Malaysian Artistes For Unity.

Malaysia Tanah AIRKU !!! NO OTHER PLACE BETTER THAN MALAYSIA !!!
Too Bad That Politicians Don't See This Manner ---> WITHOUT RACIAL BIAS.

STAND UNITED, APART WE FALL !!!




COME ON MALAYSIAN !!!
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION GO TO

MALAYSIAN ARTISTES FOR UNITY WEBSITE

I LOVE YOU MALAYSIA !! MY LOVE FOR U CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY EVEN OUTSIDERS MAKE FUN OF MY COUNTRY !!

-Where can we have good mamak food ??
-Where can we have good chinese food ??
-Where can we have good indian food ??
-Where can we have good malay food ??

KERANAMU MALAYSIA !!!

For Laughter Since It's Monday....

He has the Golden BALLS !!!





BIGGER BOMB THAN C4 ??

Klang MIC Chairman's Police Report Aganist Samy Velu and Son Velpari

MY GOD !!! MADNESS !!! TIME TO SAY GOODBYE TO SAMY VELU OR SEMI VALUED OR NO VALUE AT ALL.

Nazri Blames EC Chief , EC Chief Blames Cabinet.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz faulted the Election Commission for the debacle over the indelible ink as the commission had not consulted the attorney-general for his advice.

In his winding up speech, Nazri told parliament that the cabinet had told EC chairperson Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman two week before the Feb 13 dissolution of parliament that it rejected the commission's proposal to mark voter's thumbnail with indelible ink.

Despite receiving the cabinet's advice that "kekecohan" (havoc) could arise and the general election it's "jeopardised" if some voters insisted on voting despite declaring in writing their unwillingness to have their thumbnail marked with indelible ink, the EC went on with its plan for its usage, said Nazri.

"WE RAISED THIS ISSUE AND INFORMED EC, AND IT WAS FOR THE EC TO DECIDE WHETHER TO CARRY ON OR NOT. THEY MADE THE DECISION AND PERHAPS THEY MADE THE DECISION WITHOUT REFERRING TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL", he said in answer to a question from Tian Chua(PKR-Batu)
"IT'S CLEAR THAT THE DECISION WAS TAKEN WITHOUT ADVICE OF THE AG, AND THIS WOULD HAVE JEOPARDISED THE GENERAL ELECTIONS IF ANYTHING HAPPENED," HE ADDED.

"I WOULD NOT LIE"

Nazri also insisted that there were no order for the EC to cancel it's plan for the indelible ink.

"We did not issue an order, I can assure you, we did not order it. I would not lie,"he said (AH AHA AH CORRECT CORRECT CORRECT)

Soon after, Fong Po Kuan (DAP-Batu Gajah) insisted on knowing as to who was lying as the EC chief had previously said the usage of indelible ink had been "REJECTED" by the cabinet.

"THERE MUST BE SOMEONE TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS AND NOT TO SPIN THE FACTS. TELL THE TRUTH !!! WHO IS THE ONE TRYING TO LIE HERE ? " FONG DEMANDED.

She also noted that if the EC had taken the trouble to refer to the National Fatwa Council for it's position on the use of Indelible Ink on Muslim Voter, the EC surely have referred to the AG if it thought it was necessary.

"WHO IS THE ONE THAT DID NOT DO THEIR WORK?" she thundered.

Nazri quipped back: "It's the EC that did not do its work, lah"

Nazri also told Fong that there is difference between the cabinet rejecting a proposal and an order for a proposal to be scrapped. (SO THE PEOPLE IN THE ELECTION COMMISSION DON'T KNOW WHAT THEIR ARE DOING ?? PASSING THE BILL TO 66 YEARS OLD AND NOW YOU SAYING THIS ?? RELEVANT MR.NAZRI ??

"IF WE (THE CABINET) DO NOT AGREE (WITH A PROPOSAL), THAT MEANS WE REJECT IT. BUT WHETHER THE EC WANTS TO TAKE (OUR) ADVICE IS UP TO THEM. IF WE HAD ORDERED THEM (TO SCRAP INDELIBLE INK) EARLY ON, THE EC WOULD HAVE ANNOUNCED IT WOULD NOT USE THE INDELIBLE INK, "SAID NAZRI.

"WE SURRENDERED (THE DECISION) TO THEM," HE ADDED.

Nazri also said that the eventual scrapping of the indelible ink FOUR DAYS( IN CHINESE MEANS MATI) before the general elections was among the reasons Barisan Nasional lost many votes due to the perception that it was seeking to win through illegal means.

Other than the security issue of counterfeit ink, he added, the scrapping of indelible ink was due to concern that its imposition on voters would have violated their constitutional right to vote.

I WOULD SAY THAT, 1ST CLASS FACILITIES 3RD CLASS MENTATILY. LOOKED AT NEPAL AND INDIA FOR EXAMPLES.

OH GOD, PLEASE CORRECT CORRECT CORRECT THE MISTAKES DONE BY OUR MALAYSIAN !!!